The story (for the sales conversation)
"The deal is signed. Now the customer waits weeks while provisioning, identity and billing get set up by hand across teams. This agent turns the signature into a live environment the same day — and reads the fine print in the deal notes."
😣 Today, without the agent
Northwind closes on Friday. The CS manager files a provisioning ticket, emails finance to set up billing, and asks security to create the admin login. The deal notes say "needs EU data residency and SSO via their Okta" — but that detail sits in Salesforce and nobody reads it until the environment is already built in the wrong region. Go-live slips two weeks and the customer's first impression is a delay.
😌 The same day, with the agent
The opportunity flips to closed-won. The agent reads the deal, resolves the Growth-tier playbook, and notices the deal note. It interprets "EU data residency" as the eu-west region and "SSO via their Okta" as a federation setup, and asks the account team to confirm before provisioning. On approval it runs Terraform in eu-west, creates the admin identity, activates the Stripe subscription, and opens the kickoff.
"For a standard tier it just runs. For anything custom — data residency, SSO, a non-standard environment — it interprets the requirement, shows you the plan, and waits for a yes. Provisioning and billing are reversible, audited actions."
The villain: the hand-off gap
Sign-to-live is a manual relay across IT, finance and security.
The hero: playbook + interpretation
The agent runs the tier playbook and reads custom requirements from the deal.
The reason to trust it
Custom config and billing are confirmed by a human; every action is a reversible ticket.